GREEK THINKING VERSUS(?) HEBREW THINKING …
Some Christians today (particularly those who, like me,
have been influenced by the Messianic Movement) sometimes act as if we
disciples of Yeshua/Jesus were dropped off from a different planet, with its
own otherworldly culture. Or like at least disciples in Paul's and John's day
were dropped off from a different planet. Commendably seeking to return to
their/our "Hebrew Roots" in terms of reading Scripture, yet
themselves often employing "Greek" style "either/or"
thinking and argumentation (thus setting up false dichotomies), these modern
disciples of Yeshua/Jesus insist that "Greek thinking" should have no
place in the Christian's life.
Huh? I can't help it. God sovereignty determined that I
would be born into the country and the culture that is now a part of me. And a
segment of that culture -- a huge chunk of it, in fact! – employs "Greek thinking."
Is that automatically adverse to "Hebrew
thinking"? I *think* not... :)
Just as a quick "for instance":
Paul, the "Hebrew of Hebrews," could quote the
Greek poets Epimenides and Aratus (or Cleanthes ... there is some uncertainty
because of verbal overlap), applying to YHWH statements in those poetic
writings made expressly about Zeus (Act 17:28)! So why should we assume that
other ideas and practices which find parallels in Greek literature are to be
dismissed as completely pagan? Sort of the Pagan Christianity approach ...
Was Paul being un-Hebrew or "pagan" when he did
what he did?
I find it hard to believe that the Greeks had it all
wrong and that becoming a Gentile Christian in Paul's day meant learning an
entirely foreign train of thought ... with almost zero points in common between
"Greek thinking" and "Hebrew thinking." But that's what
many of today's Messianics would have us believe.
I would rather assume (based on evidence) that Greek
philosophical speculations, disseminated by this time through mainly the
neo-Platonic and Stoic movements, helped pave the road for the acceptance of
the gospel among the Gentiles. When you become acclimated to "Greek
thinking" you can better see that the NT writers employed it all of the
time as they shared the very Hebrew concepts of monotheism, a Messianic
king/deliverer, and righteousness one day pervading the entire earth.
Like most ideas, these biblical concepts could be wrapped
up in different clothes, so to speak, and still be understood adequately. There
are some differences of emphasis between "Greek thinking" and
"Hebrew thinking" ... some cultural angles that must be analyzed, caught,
or abandoned. But by-and-large, the gospel and its surrounding concepts make
enough sense in each culture into which they enter simply because of the
general human condition.
Therefore, it is not advantageous for folks to
dichotomize ‘too far’ between "Hebrew thinking" and "Greek
thinking." For points of emphasis? Sure ... some differences can be
highlighted. But to paint a picture that these two styles of thinking were
worlds apart is not accurate -- not according to the uninspired historical
records we have at our disposal and not according to God-breathed records we
have in Holy Scripture. There was and remains adequate overlap between
"Greek thinking" and "Hebrew thinking" to communicate what
God wants to say to all humankind.
Christian, what you expect from other disciples of Jesus
Christ is not necessarily God's will. A lot of times what you're expecting is
culturally (not biblically) derived.
Christ is our life (Col 3:5), but his life will
necessarily look slightly different here and there ... depending upon which
cultures his life in us gets "translated" into. One of the biggest
problems I see in the EKKLESIA, and in the resulting mission to the nations, is
a confusion of biblical truth with the sending and sent people's cultures. We
Christians too often underestimate the fact that our own cultures create lenses
which refract, often even “distort” essential biblical truth. As long as we
think that being "in Christ" and being filled with the Holy Spirit
are all we need to stop repeating the mistakes of the past ... then we will
keep repeating the mistakes of the past.
-Michael Millier
No comments:
Post a Comment